Keohi HDTV



Powered by Keohi Web Design


ISF/M-TLV Calibration Report Version 2.0

Something New, Something Old
The Art of Presenting Grayscale Calibration Work To The Public

<< Back to Calibrators

Page 1 | Page 2

(Jan 17, 2003)


This is just a brief update on where I am with the grayscale calibration template that I developed.  The original version has had about four to five months now to circulate amongst the various ISF professionals out there and I have gotten some very constructive feedback on some changes that might improve the form.

Well, with the assistance and input of Mel at DavLyn HTC and Doug Weil at Clearly Resolved Image & Sound, I’ve been able to update the form to do a bit more than what it originally did.  The visual scatter graph has now been added that really helps to illustrate the X and Y coordinates that we were recording.  I had wanted to add the scatter graph at the beginning, but my graphing making skills were not so great in Excel.

I’ve done away with the total distance summary at the bottom and now use an average distance calculation instead to give you an average on how far off things were and where they end up.   Also added is a bias-tint column for the pre-calibration numbers as well.

The entire form is formatted on an Excel spreadsheet and will print out fully on one sheet of paper for easy presentation.  I recommend that the sheet be presented in colour form though as that is more appealing to look at.

As an added bonus, there is a second sheet attached to the main spreadsheet which I have customized for Black & White films and a colour temperature setting of 5400K.  For those doing the off set for this mode, just select the second sheet and repeat the process based on the new X and Y coordinates for B/W material.

Think of this as the ISF/M-TLV Calibration Report Version 2.0.  As always, I welcome input and suggestions that might further improve the format.


Michael TLV writes:

Up until now, magazines and other information sources on Grayscale calibration presented results to a small, but curious public in the form of Grayscale graphs charting the colour temperature versus various intensities of gray.  A sample of such a chart is shown below.  We see these in all the home theatre magazines and some ISF calibrators provide their customers with something similar called the ISF calibration report where the primary focus is on the big before versus after graph.

Now by itself, the graph is a nice visual presentation of the TV’s grayscale tracking before calibration and after calibration.  Now here comes the problem.  The grayscale graph is a gross simplification of the grayscale calibration process and the science behind what is being done. (Although actually doing a grayscale is not that difficult with the proper tools.)  It is presented in this graphical format because it is feared that the public cannot grasp anything slightly more complex about grayscale calibration and the basic theory behind it.

I bring this up because on not so rare occasions, the information presented on the graph is often extremely misleading.  I have described the grayscale calibration graph to my clients as being something akin to a 2-D representation of something that is 3-D.  I draw a sphere on a piece of paper and it looks like a circle.  As a result, just because something looks close on a colourful graph may not actually mean anything.  A blunt and extreme example that I like to use is to place your thumb into the night sky right next to the full moon.

From a two dimensional perspective, your thumb is now as large as the moon and possibly bigger.  As such, can we walk away and conclude that the moon is not very large at all?  In a two dimensional universe, the answer would be “yes.”  Of course we inhabit a three dimensional universe so the answer is “no,” because we know that there is also a “Z” axis in three dimensional space. X,Y,Z coordinates in real space.  Width, Height and Depth …

The grayscale charts that we see in magazines simply do not do justice to the grayscale calibration theory.  And often times, a client will misinterpret these same grayscale graphs and conclude that his TV was so closely tracking grayscale out of the box than he did not really need to hire you in the first place.  Yes, there are cases where some TVs really are close from the factory, but this has been fairly rare and so far, continues to be rare.   It’s just that sinking feeling that one gets when his client misunderstands the grayscale chart information.  When this happens, you can end up with an unhappy client and everything goes sour on you (doubtful, but possible).

I want to bring in a few exhibits here that are gross exaggerations, but do, hopefully, get the point across.  The grayscale calibration chart sample below represents the major deficiency of the current graphical presentation method.  We have a case where the pre-calibration grayscale tracking appears to closely resemble the post calibration grayscale tracking.

The reaction from the uneducated public would be that the TV in question was pretty accurate out of the box and that the calibrator probably did not have to do very much if anything at all to fix this.  This is what a graph shows you … and this is what the image actually looked like before calibration versus after calibration.

It is nearly impossible for the home theatre publications to present to us what the actual image looks like on the TV.  Hence we have the grayscale calibration charts that are easy to translate to print.  Now the pre-calibration image of the resident Furry Pig is quite simply … all wrong.  It is too green.   The post calibrated image is pretty much where the image should be and yet the graph doesn’t show this at all.  This is why the calibrated grayscale graph that we see in magazines have the potential to also be terribly misleading.  Good data presented the wrong way can lead to unfortunate and erroneous conclusions. 

Of course the fact that I am presenting images on a web site also introduces a plethora of potential errors.   The irony of this fact did dawn on me.   All images are therefore presented for illustration purposes only.  I have to figure that even the poorest tuned computer monitors out there will at least be able to show the reader that the two images of the Furry Pig look distinctly different.  How that difference is manifested on the screen, I have no idea. 

From the two-dimensional perspective, it is the same as your thumb being as big as the moon.  Now imagine that you can see 12 inches behind the graph and 12 inches in front of it.  The further behind the graph you go, the greener your image becomes.  The further in front you get, the more red/purple the image becomes.  The green pre-calibration Furry Pig is actually located six inches behind the graph.  The post calibration Furry Pig is located on the graph itself.  The idea in calibration is to get the curve onto the surface of the graph itself too, not in front or in back.  This is what D6500K is all about.  There are lots of 6500K readings both in front of the chart as well as behind it.  Sometimes, the curious public loses sight of this and simply gets focused on the magic 6500K number thinking that it is only the number 6500 that is all important.

Page 1 | Page 2