ISF/M-TLV Calibration Report Version 4.0
Something New, Something Old
The Art of Presenting Grayscale Calibration Work To The Public
<< Back to Calibrators
Page 1 | Page
This is going to be a quick update presenting version 4.0 of the
ISF/M-TLV Calibration Template. It incorporates the formulas discussed in the
January 2004 issue of Widescreen Review magazine and I direct all those that are
interested to go read the articles for a better explanation of the theory.
In more simple terms, the revisions deal with how the human eye
perceives differences in grayscale as we can see differences easier in certain colour
ranges as compared to others. Errors in the green and red ranges are far easier to
spot compared to errors in toward the blue. A smaller error to the green side can
actually be more distracting than a larger error to the blue end of the spectrum.
This effect was touched upon in the text description of the previous
version 3.0. Greg Rogers and Bill Cushman have taken this idea much further and have
developed a mathematical relationship that weighs the X and Y values to account for the
way the eye sees colours.
The end result is this delta E terminology and the
numeric result is now included in the chart itself. High dE values are essentially
undesirable while low ones mean a more accurate grayscale. In their article, they
talk about how values of 3 or less mean essentially a perfect grayscale, and 5 or less
being very good. 10 or less is tolerable
and so forth.
Michael @ The Laser Video Experience
Michael TLV writes:
Up until now, magazines and other information sources on Grayscale
calibration presented results to a small, but curious public in the form of Grayscale
graphs charting the colour temperature versus various intensities of gray. A sample of such a chart is shown below. We see these in all the home theatre magazines and
some ISF calibrators provide their customers with something similar called the ISF
calibration report where the primary focus is on the big before versus after graph.
Now by itself, the graph is a nice visual
presentation of the TVs grayscale tracking before calibration and after calibration. Now here comes the problem. The grayscale graph is a gross simplification of
the grayscale calibration process and the science behind what is being done. (Although
actually doing a grayscale is not that difficult with the proper tools.) It is presented in this graphical format because
it is feared that the public cannot grasp anything slightly more complex about grayscale
calibration and the basic theory behind it.
I bring this up because on not so rare occasions,
the information presented on the graph is often extremely misleading. I have described the grayscale calibration graph
to my clients as being something akin to a 2-D representation of something that is 3-D. I draw a sphere on a piece of paper and it looks
like a circle. As a result, just because
something looks close on a colourful graph may not actually mean anything. A blunt and extreme example that I like to use is
to place your thumb into the night sky right next to the full moon.
From a two dimensional perspective, your thumb is
now as large as the moon and possibly bigger. As
such, can we walk away and conclude that the moon is not very large at all? In a two dimensional universe, the answer would be
yes. Of course we inhabit a
three dimensional universe so the answer is no, because we know that there is
also a Z axis in three dimensional space. X,Y,Z coordinates in real space. Width, Height and Depth
The grayscale charts that we see in magazines
simply do not do justice to the grayscale calibration theory. And often times, a client will misinterpret these
same grayscale graphs and conclude that his TV was so closely tracking grayscale out of
the box than he did not really need to hire you in the first place. Yes, there are cases where some TVs really are
close from the factory, but this has been fairly rare and so far, continues to be rare. Its just that sinking feeling that one
gets when his client misunderstands the grayscale chart information. When this happens, you can end up with an unhappy
client and everything goes sour on you (doubtful, but possible).
want to bring in a few exhibits here that are gross exaggerations, but do, hopefully, get
the point across. The grayscale calibration chart sample below represents the major
deficiency of the current graphical presentation method. We have a case where the
pre-calibration grayscale tracking appears to closely resemble the post calibration
The reaction from the uneducated public would be
that the TV in question was pretty accurate out of the box and that the calibrator
probably did not have to do very much if anything at all to fix this. This is what a graph shows you
and this is
what the image actually looked like before calibration versus after calibration.
It is nearly impossible for the
home theatre publications to present to us what the actual image looks like on the TV. Hence we have the grayscale calibration charts
that are easy to translate to print. Now the
pre-calibration image of the resident Furry Pig is quite simply
all wrong. It is too green.
The post calibrated image is pretty much where the image should be and yet
the graph doesnt show this at all. This
is why the calibrated grayscale graph that we see in magazines have the potential to also
be terribly misleading. Good data presented
the wrong way can lead to unfortunate and erroneous conclusions.
Of course the fact that I am presenting images on
a web site also introduces a plethora of potential errors.
The irony of this fact did dawn on me.
All images are therefore presented for illustration purposes only. I have to figure that even the poorest tuned
computer monitors out there will at least be able to show the reader that the two images
of the Furry Pig look distinctly different. How
that difference is manifested on the screen, I have no idea.
From the two-dimensional perspective, it is the
same as your thumb being as big as the moon. Now
imagine that you can see 12 inches behind the graph and 12 inches in front of it. The further behind the graph you go, the greener
your image becomes. The further in front you
get, the more red/purple the image becomes. The
green pre-calibration Furry Pig is actually located six inches behind the graph. The post calibration Furry Pig is located on the
graph itself. The idea in calibration is to
get the curve onto the surface of the graph itself too, not in front or in back. This is what D6500K is all about. There are lots of 6500K readings both in front of
the chart as well as behind it. Sometimes,
the curious public loses sight of this and simply gets focused on the magic 6500K number
thinking that it is only the number 6500 that is all important.
Page 1 | Page 2